#Pros and cons of conjugal visits full#
#Pros and cons of conjugal visits free#

In our research, we aimed to identify and understand the causes and effects of the increasing Danish investment in closed prisons. In recent years, however, Denmark has built two new вЂњclosedвЂќ (high security) prisons. Indeed, most of DenmarkвЂ™s prisons are вЂњopenвЂќ prisons-facilities without secure perimeter fences.

The Danish prison system, like its Scandinavian neighbors, is widely accepted as among the most humane in the world. Their policies may differ from this site. Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites.

#Pros and cons of conjugal visits full#

Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval). When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. PUBLICATIONS PRODUCED AS A RESULT OF THIS RESEARCH Providing a detailed, localized analysis of punishment innovation and experience, and employing methods that include examination of government documents, analysis of news coverage, and interviews with key prison managers, architects, policymakers, prisoners, and prison staff, the project traces the inception, implementation, and impact of a particular punishment innovation.

This study takes the design and opening of Denmark's newest, high-tech, maximum-security prison with a dedicated isolation wing as a starting point for examining the causes and effects of the deepening divide between harsh and humane punishment.

#Pros and cons of conjugal visits free#

primarily for its 'open' prisons-facilities free of perimeter fences and at least partially integrated with non-prison communities-Denmark has a long but largely unacknowledged history of solitary confinement. The research design extends U.S.-focused work to Denmark, a nation often touted as a model of humane and limited incarceration.

Broader impacts include the training and education of undergraduate students and building an increasingly international community of punishment scholars. policies and practices and contribute to a growing interest among policymakers in alternative incarceration models. Findings will facilitate continued interchange of ideas that inform current U.S. By developing a greater understanding of the factors that contribute to punishment innovation in models of incarceration and the effects of these innovations on prisoners and prison staff, this work will advance sociolegal and criminological understanding of penal exceptionalism, local-level prison innovation, and the experience of punishment. The research explores 1) when and how more punitive decisions in penal incarceration get made over less punitive ones, 2) how prisoners and staff experience the implementation of these decisions within different facilities, 3) whether and how penal consciousness differs across prison security levels, and 4) how punishment innovation develops through bottom-up, local-level decision-making. This research examines the causes and effects of changing punishment and incarceration practices, with a particular focus on the deepening divide between harsh, high-security prisons and more humane, low-security prisons. Primary Place of Performance Congressional District:Д 40100В NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT 040100В NSF RESEARCH & RELATED ACTIVIT

Lori Sexton (Principal Investigator) Sponsored Research Office:.

Reggie Sheehan (703)292-5389 SES Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences SBE Direct For Social, Behav & Economic ScieДЇY 2015 = $31,932.00 FY 2016 = $28,391.00 Collaborative Research: Innovating and Experiencing Punishment NSF Org: